My Conclusions Regarding My 30 Minutes Backlinks Test

[2009-03-28 The three sites I created for this test were thin affiliate sites.  I did a very poor job of creating the sites and have not done what needs to be done to make them good sites.  As a result, I have not kept the domains, and you will no longer be able to look up these sites in Google.  If you find any results after this update then that means someone else bought the URLs and anything you find is not mine.]

It has now been over a month since I started my test of 30 Minute Backlinks, a test I started on April 19, 2008. This has been an interesting test and I think enough time has passed for me to end this test and come to a conclusion.

First, though, I will share the most recent stats for each site:

.

Site #1 – Minimal Promotion

Date URL purchased: 04/07/2008
Date toolbar submitted to shareware repository: 04/19/2008
Date of first backlink: 04/19/2008
Number of backlinks (as of 05/27/2008): 56 (increase of 47)
Number of site pages indexed in Google (as of 05/27/2008): 49 (increase of 48)
Statistics for robots/spiders from Awstat (as of 05/27/2008):
Robots/Spiders visitors (Top 25) 
8 different robots*HitsBandwidthLast visit
Googlebot223+215.13 MB26 May 2008 – 18:01
Yahoo Slurp142+737.15 MB26 May 2008 – 18:25
Unknown robot (identified by ‘crawl’)14129.85 KB25 May 2008 – 09:54
Unknown robot (identified by hit on ‘robots.txt’)0+104.98 KB16 May 2008 – 07:07
Unknown robot (identified by ‘bot/’ or ‘bot-’)5+5128.05 KB26 May 2008 – 20:35
Google Sitemaps5124.19 KB16 May 2008 – 10:01
Alexa (IA Archiver)3+144.19 KB23 May 2008 – 03:25
MSNBot-media1+131.24 KB17 May 2008 – 22:44

Site #2 – Moderate Promotion

Date URL purchased: 04/07/2008
Date toolbar submitted to shareware repository: 04/19/2008
Date toolbar submitted to 30 software directories: 04/19/2008
Date of first backlink: 04/19/2008
Number of backlinks (as of 05/27/2008): 53 (increase of 46)
Number of site pages indexed in Google (as of 05/27/2008): 95 (increase of 90)
Statistics for robots/spiders from Awstat (as of 05/27/2008):
Robots/Spiders visitors (Top 25) 
9 different robots*HitsBandwidthLast visit
Yahoo Slurp621+10413.95 MB27 May 2008 – 03:33
Googlebot266+215.41 MB26 May 2008 – 11:31
Unknown robot (identified by ’spider’)19+14496.23 KB25 May 2008 – 22:18
Unknown robot (identified by ‘robot’)23218.61 KB27 May 2008 – 01:07
Unknown robot (identified by ‘crawl’)17+3144.11 KB25 May 2008 – 09:54
Unknown robot (identified by ‘bot/’ or ‘bot-’)5+5122.67 KB26 May 2008 – 20:42
Unknown robot (identified by hit on ‘robots.txt’)0+83.99 KB16 May 2008 – 10:33
Google Sitemaps495.43 KB16 May 2008 – 10:03
MSNBot-media2+2494.31 KB20 May 2008 – 20:35

Site #3 – Maximum Promotion

Date URL purchased: 04/13/2008
Date toolbar submitted to shareware repository: 04/19/2008
Date toolbar submitted to 800+ software directories: 04/19/2008
Date of first backlink: 04/19/2008
Number of backlinks (as of 05/27/2008): 581 (increase of 531)
Number of site pages indexed in Google (as of 05/27/2008): 23 (increase of 23)
Statistics for robots/spiders from Awstat (as of 05/27/2008):
Robots/Spiders visitors (Top 25) 
9 different robots*HitsBandwidthLast visit
Yahoo Slurp216+956.57 MB27 May 2008 – 02:03
Googlebot203+267.01 MB27 May 2008 – 04:19
Unknown robot (identified by ’spider’)17+13370.58 KB26 May 2008 – 04:33
Unknown robot (identified by ‘robot’)23217.47 KB27 May 2008 – 01:07
Unknown robot (identified by ‘bot/’ or ‘bot-’)9+5166.39 KB26 May 2008 – 09:52
Unknown robot (identified by ‘crawl’)14131.59 KB25 May 2008 – 09:54
MSNBot3+358.26 KB12 May 2008 – 03:44
Unknown robot (identified by hit on ‘robots.txt’)0+52.51 KB15 May 2008 – 16:27
Google Sitemaps250.55 KB15 May 2008 – 16:05
.v

Now that I have data I am going to break down this information to come to a conclusion about 30 Minute Backlinks. But first I will refresh your memories on what promotional methods I used.

 

How did I promote the toolbars I created?

When I created the toolbars I had several options for letting the various software directories know I had something they could list. Here are the methods I used:

Minimal Promotional Method = Doing nothing more than submitting the PAD file to the PAD file repository and letting the many software directories find my software on their own. If you purchased 30 Minute Backlinks you will learn all about this. I will not go into details as I don’t want to undermine the efforts Michelle MacPhearson did in creating her 30 Minute Backlinks.

Moderate Promotional Method = I used a software program that submits PAD files to about 30 software directories.

Maximum Promotional Method = I used a software program (this program was different from the one I used for moderate promotion) that submits PAD files to about 800 software directories.

 

Did the promotional method make a difference?

Here is a breakdown of each method:

Minimal Promotion – 56 backlinks, 49 site pages indexed in Google (I’m not sure how to determine how many pages my site has, but according to Google Webmaster Tools my sitemap has 34 URLs submitted).

Moderate Promotion – 53 backlinks, 95 site pages indexed in Google (per Google Webmaster Tools my sitemap has 201 URLs submitted).

Maximum Promotion – 581 backlinks, 23 site pages indexed in Google (per Google Webmaster Tools my sitemap has 106 URLs submitted).

Yes, I think the promotional method definitely made a difference. Clearly the site with the maximum promotion has the most backlinks. But, has it made a difference in how my niche stores are doing? I’ll look at some additional statistics to decide this.

 

Are the sites earning money?

Minimal Promotion – 63 unique visitors, 62 clicks, 25 bids, earned $9.06 (as of 05/27/2008)

Moderate Promotion – 18 unique visitors, 43 clicks, 15 bids, earned $7.72 (as of 05/27/2008)

Maximum Promotion – 33 unique visitors, 23 clicks, 0 bids, earned $0.00 (as of 05/27/2008)

Isn’t it interesting that the site that had the least promotion for the toolbar has the most unique visitors, clicks, bids, and affiliate earnings? Looking at these stats, it seems that the promotional method really didn’t matter. In fact, I can’t help but wonder if Google dislikes the large amount of backlinks the site that used maximum promotion and is punishing it.

 

Do I recommend PAD promotional tools?

No. I first started 30 Minute Backlinks around the time eBay changed their affiliate program from Commission Junction to EPN. At that time (early April, 2008) I created toolbars for two of my niche stores that are almost a year old. The first site I added it to is my best site, meaning it brings in my best commissions, and I used the maximum promotional method for this site. Almost immediately traffic disappeared from this site, and I wondered if it was because of the huge increase in backlinks or had something to do with the new EPN system.

The other site I added the toolbar to was one that also consistently brings in commissions, but for that one I did the minimal promotional method. The traffic for that site did not drop. In fact, it has increased, and become my second best site.

Based on this test and the two other sites I created toolbars for I have concluded that you do NOT need to purchase PAD promoting software. In fact, I think it may hurt your efforts to do so.

 

What are the sites I used for this test?

Now that I’ve concluded this test I will share with you the sites I used. I purposely chose created three sites that were as similar as possible, without being the same, so I could be as fair as possible with this test. As you will see, these sites are in niches that are rather saturated:

Minimal Promotional Method = Toys Boys Want

Moderate Promotional Method = Toys Girls Want

Maximum Promotional Method = Kids Want These Toys (gender neutral toys)

 

Do I recommend 30 Minute Backlinks?

Yes. These three stores are less than two months old and the only promotion I’ve done is to submit them to Google Webmaster Tools (something I do for every store I create), and create the toolbars and submit them to various software directories. Honestly, the revenues these stores have made in the one + month since starting this test is more than some of my other sites have made that are several months older.

Following the instructions in 30 Minute Backlinks to create toolbars is extremely easy. Once you’ve done a few you will be able to create them even quicker. I still haven’t had the time to create any of the other four tools Michelle discusses but hope to soon.

If you decide to purchase 30 Minute Backlinks I strongly suggest you make toolbars that will actually benefit people. In other words, make your toolbar something people will actually want to use. You never know when people will find it useful and actually use it.

Rochelle

38 Responses to “My Conclusions Regarding My 30 Minutes Backlinks Test”

  1. [...] My Conclusions Regarding My 30 Minutes Backlinks Test [...]

  2. SEO Diva says:

    Thanks for sharing this, Rochelle – I’ve been watching your progress with interest. I wasn’t sure if I wanted to use the PAD tool; instead I’ll look up software directories and submit to them individually.

    Kay

  3. Michelle, Thanks for the update on this.

    I noticed the links to the site you used are not working. Giving a not found page. Looks like it has this domain and then that domain tacked onto it.

    Keep up the good work!

  4. Rochelle says:

    GrinningFool,

    Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Which links aren’t working? They all seem fine on my end but I have been having problems recently with my links.

    Rochelle

    Edit – Never mind, I figured out which links weren’t working and have corrected them. Again, thank you for telling me about this.

  5. Jamie says:

    Thanks for sharing the results – Interesting results!

    Jamie

  6. Lionmom100 says:

    Rochelle,
    I bit the bullet and purchased this membership and submitted my first toolbar two days ago. (I submitted my second one last night.) I checked this morning and have five new backlinks for the site I submitted. Hope this brings the additional purchases as well. I hope you get some credit for the purchase.

    Yael

  7. Paul says:

    I don’t see any benefit here. The toys boys want website is automatically going to make more money than the others just on the proximity the domain has to “big boys toys” and the popularity of that term.

    To me the payback on 30 minute backlinks is not near what Michelle was suggesting a month ago. If I’m going to pay $100 for a method to increase my traffic I would expect it to at least do better than conventional keyword phrase methods or “Bum Marketing” I can get just as many backlinks by posting comments to a few well placed do follow blogs.

    Am I missing the point here?

    By the way, don’t forget Quassia. It is helping me get a few Google backlinks.

  8. Rochelle says:

    Paul,

    Regarding my boys toys store, I actually think the popularity of that term will make it more difficult for this store to get traffic because it has a LOT of competition. So I disagree that this store will naturally have more traffic/sales because of these keywords. Plus, it is close enough to ‘boy toys’ that it may get unwanted visitors who are looking for toys of a more adult nature.

    As to the benefit, the way I see it is this: Search engines, such as Google, look to see how many relevant backlinks any given website has. If a website has few or no backlinks then the search engines think the site isn’t important and will rank it low in search engine results.

    If, however, a site has many relevant backlinks then the search engines will see that site as both important in its topic and popular among other sites who must also think it is important in its topic. The search engines will then rank the site higher in search engine results, which gives the site a much better chance at getting visitors.

    The key word in what I just said is ‘relevant.’ When I say relevant I mean the other sites that link to the site you created have information that is similar to your site’s topic. Search engines see relevant backlinks as a way of other sites validating the information your site has.

    Yes, you could achieve similar results as 30 Minute Backlinks by posting comments on blogs but that takes longer to achieve. The method Michelle teaches is very simple to do and takes, well, 30 minutes of work. BTW, if you choose to promote your sites by commenting on blogs don’t ignore blogs that use ‘do not follow’ links as search engines may think you are up to something by only posting on ‘do follow’ blogs. Sorry I can’t give you a source for that but I’ve read in many places that you are better off posting on both types of blogs than just ‘do follow’ blogs.

    I’m not sure if you are missing anything but it sounds like this may not be the promotional method for you.

    Rochelle

  9. Rochelle says:

    Yael,

    I’d love to hear how this method works for you and if you think it is worthwhile in the long run.

    I checked my stats and I did get credit for your purchase. Thank you :)

    Rochelle

  10. Paul says:

    Yes, I was being too simplistic…. you need do follow and no follow links.
    And I did miss the point. I was only looking at the number of backlinks in your report and forgot that you need RELEVANT backlinks whenever possible. If 30 minute backlinks helps you get relevant links so much the better.

  11. Lionmom100 says:

    Rochelle,

    I’ll keep you posted. So far, I think I am seeing results. I would like to see that translate into $ in the long run. I think this method has potential. I am interested in using whatever method or method that work as long as it’s kosher and not spreading myself too thin.

    So far, I am starting with my sites that get the least traffic, but plan to work my way up the line. Right now, I am doing a site a night. And just think, all I was doing on your site was looking for instructions on how to install Wordpress….boy did I get distracted! Still haven’t looked up the Wordpress instructions.

    Yael

  12. Rita says:

    Rachel, which web log analyzer are you using for your statistics?
    It seems like I am having trouble of finding a reliable one..
    So I wonder if you can point me to the site where I can get the one you are using…
    Thanks,
    Rita

  13. Rita says:

    Rachel, which web log analyzer are you using for your statistics?
    It seems like I am having trouble of finding a reliable one..
    So I wonder if you can point me to the site where I can get the one you are using…
    Thanks,
    Rita

  14. Rochelle says:

    Yael,

    I look forward to hearing how this works for you.

    As to wordpress instructions, that is one thing I don’t have on here. Yet… I plan on writing about wordpress blogging and niche stores soon.

    Rochelle

  15. Paul says:

    I look forward to your insitght on Wordpress. In the meantime go to http://www.JTPratt.com JT has been VERY successful using Wordpress and explains all he does to make his blogs successful. For example, read “20 Things Wordpress Doesn’t Do Out of the Box”

  16. Rochelle says:

    Paul,

    JT’s blog is one I’ve definately learned from! I highly recommend it.

    Rochelle

  17. Rochelle says:

    Rita,

    I used Awstats for the stats you see here. This is the choice I like best of what’s available in my cPanel.

    Rochelle

  18. Rochelle says:

    Rita,

    Sorry, I forgot to mention above that I also use http://StatCounter.com for statistics. I wrote about how to add their counters to your sites at http://www.nichestorestrategie.....your-site/

    StatCounter shows much the same information that Awstats does, but I like that I can access stats to all my sites in one place.

    Rochelle

  19. Yael says:

    Rochelle,

    Thanks for letting me know. I am totally baffled by Wordpress’ instructions. I will keep trying, but right now I am trying to finish all of my other toolbars. So far I have had modest numbers of backlinks, with a new one being added per site every day or two. I used some of the promtion software similarly to your moderate promotion model. The one thing I have found is that Avangate has rejected most of my toolbars and I have no idea why (other than hey may not like ones that are clearly promotional). Have you had a similar experience with them if you submitted through them?? I did send them an e-mail asking what would make them acceptable for them. We will see.

    Yael

  20. Rochelle says:

    Yael,

    Apparently Avangate is rejecting a huge number of submissions. My first attempt was rejected and I, too, emailed them to find out what I did wrong and how to correct it. That was over two months ago and I’ve yet to hear back from them. If you email you please share what they say.

    Rochelle

  21. Lionmom100 says:

    Rochelle,

    Well, at least I am not the only one who has had files rejected. I have had three more rejections now. I have not heard back ont he first e-mail. I am almost done submitting toolbars and will safe up my rejections until the end before I send another e-mail. I’m not holding my breath.

  22. [...] Backlinks10 Days After Starting 30 Minute Backlinks TestAdd 30 Minute Backlinks Toolbar to Your SiteMy Conclusions Regarding My 30 Minutes Backlinks TestI’m Putting 30 Minute Backlinks to the TestI’m Going to Try 30 Minute BacklinksI Created [...]

  23. Scott says:

    Hi Rochelle,

    First of all, thanks for reviewing this product and sharing your results.

    I just did a quick check on your backlinks and found these results compared to your figures from May 27th.

    Backlinks from “software related sites” are:

    toysboyswant.com = google 0 – yahoo 2
    toysgirlswant.com = google 0 – yahoo 8
    kidswantthesetoys.com = google 0 – yahoo about 54 +/-

    So, for $97 (not including the submission software), and your time and effort, do you still think after 2 months this product is worth it?

    What I’d be interested in knowing is, do you have any stats to determine how many visitors you have received from those who have downloaded your toolbar? If you eventually don’t get many links for SEO but get visitors from those who install your tool bar then MAYBE it’s worth it…maybe.

    Any other thoughts? Are you still building with Michelle’s other techniques and seeing any positive results? Have you made your $97 back yet?

    Sorry for all the questions, still on the fence with this one

    Cheers

    Scott

  24. Rochelle says:

    Scott,

    I’ve had no luck using the ‘link:url.com’ in Google so I didn’t come to my results using that. I’m probably looking at this differently than you.

    The way I arrived at my figures was by searching for the keyword phrases I targeted for each site. For example, for one site I targeted the term, “gender neutral toys.”

    However, if you simply search for “gender neutral toys” you will get results for my site, as well as any others targeting that term. To see only results for my site I searched for “gender neutral toys toolbar” 1.0. The last time I checked for this there were over 500 results in Google.

    None of those links to to my site but to the software sites. On each of those sites there are backlinks to my site.

    Now, the next question should be, am I actually getting traffic from these software sites? The answer is, “Yes.” I can’t show an image here so what I’ll do is create another followup post showing where I’m getting traffic from.

    But, to answer your question, I do think it is worth paying for this. It really is an easy thing to do and it does work (for me, at least).

    Rochelle

  25. Scott says:

    Hi Rochelle,

    Thanks for responding. You’re right, the main thing is getting traffic and hopefully sales.

    The more I thought about how this works the more I could see the potential more in people downloading/installing a toolbar with info (ie affiliate links lol) that would appeal to them rather than purely backlinks.

    I suppose if you can manage both you’re onto a winner.

    Glad it’s working for you though! Would be interesting to see if you are getting much traffic from those who installed the tb.

    Cheers

  26. Rochelle says:

    Scott,

    I don’t think there is a way to tell if any of my traffic is from the toolbar I created (and, yes, I do add affiliate links to my toolbars!). If someone did come to my site from the toolbar then my stats would show that someone simply showed up at my site, there would be no referring URL, because the toolbar isn’t a URL. So, who knows? I do have stats that have people simply arriving at my site, which could be from toolbar users, or it could be people typing my site’s URL into their URL bar (I can’t remember what this is called).

    I do know, though, that people are installing the toolbars. I have no way of tracking installations that are done from the software sites, because those toolbars are installed from my site. But I have links on my niche stores that will allow people to install the toolbars I made. These installations are done at Conduit.com, and they track installations. So I’m able to log in to Conduit and see if people are installing and using the toolbars, and I’m surprised to see that they are.

    Rochelle

  27. Scott says:

    Hi Rochelle,

    Thanks for sharing! I don’t know if 30 minute backlinks is within my budget but I took a look at Conduit and can see much more benefit than just backlinks…such as people downloading your toolbar and buying from your site.

    Ultimately, that’s what we want anyway eh? So, I’m happy to hear people are downloading your toolbar. Well done!

    I’ll save up for a copy of 30 minute backlinks unless you have an affiliate link with a discount for the product *wink *wink lol

    Cheers

  28. Rochelle says:

    Scott,

    I certainly do have an affiliate link but, sorry, no discounts! Nice try, though ;)

    Rochelle

  29. @Rochelle
    I just tuned into this thread doing some research on StumbleUpon and, well, Stumbled upon this site. So, sorry for the replies to an ancient thread. I’ve noticed that your sites are all now blank pagerank and have zero pages indexed. It seems that the human checkers for Google have determined that your sites should be blacklisted for whatever reason.

    I’ve also had a similar problem when using massive link-building campaigns on a brand-new domain, even those that have had “real” content that Google would not have seen as spam.

    Just curious if you used any other black-hat SEO techniques on these domains other than the massive link-building techniques via software registration sites

    - Daiv

  30. Rochelle says:

    Daiv,

    Just to clarify, I do not consider 30 Minute Backlinks to be a blackhat method. It is a legit method of getting backlinks.

    I should probably add an addendum to this post. Not too long after I completed this my house was flooded by a tropical storm. It is now seven months after the flooding, and we still have several months of work to go. My purpose in saying that is because I’ve completely neglected the sites I used for this test. I did nothing more than use 30 Minute Backlinks to promote this site, which, I’m sure, is why Google now dislikes them.

    And, truth be told, I didn’t do a great job creating the sites. They are thin affiliate sites, which Google hates. That is the reason there are no listings in Google (I haven’t checked it in months to confirm, but will take your word about there being no pages indexed). A site needs to be promoted in many ways, not just this one.

    You mentioned that you did a massive link-building campaign on a new site of yours. Be careful how you do that. You want to add links slowly, not quickly, or search engines will know something is up. The slow approach is how most sites naturally get their backlinks.

    Regarding your question, I do not use blackhat methods. I do use several methods, all above board. At this time, my method includes keyword research, writing new content pages, submitting them to an article distribution site (which I’ll probably write about at some point, as it works wonderfully), directory submissions, and a few other promotional methods. I do a LOT more than I did when I created these sites. I hope that helps.

    Rochelle

  31. onesource says:

    Thanks for the revies of this product. It was one I was considering for my online shopping website. Thanks!!!

  32. Rich says:

    Thanks for your objective test. Rare to find something so free of hyperbole on the first page of a google search!

    I’d be interested in knowing what the quality of these links was. The main attraction of this product is that it promises backlinks from high PR software directories – PR4,5,6 and 7. Did you find a noticeable amount of these popping up? If so it would indeed be a valuable tool… although if they’re all PR0-1, I can think of cheaper and quicker methods of getting 50 links.

    Be interesting to hear.

    Thanks,
    Rich

  33. Rochelle says:

    Rich,

    I’m afraid I’m not going to be much help with your inquiry. If you’ve read through my blog you may know that my house was flooded last August. This was a major event that forced us out of our house for over five months. I am still doing repairs on the house, and have at least one more month to go.

    The only reason I mention that is because much of my online stuff has been put on hold or abandoned during this process (which has been going on for almost a year now). One of the things to be abandoned was the sites I used to test the 30 Minute Backlinks method. So, I have no idea what the quality of the links was. It didn’t occur to me at the time to check them, though I should have done so. If I test this again I’ll be sure to check the quality.

    I have not had the time to get back into this method. It does work, but shouldn’t be used as the only method to get backlinks.

    Perhaps someone reading this who uses 30 Minute Backlinks will be kind enough to share their results and the quality of the backlinks.

    Rochelle

  34. David says:

    Nice post having excellent contents. I have been searching for this type of posts. Thanks a lot for writing this post. I came to know a lot of useful things from this post. I think this post will definitely helpful for the readers like me. Thanks a lot for sharing.

  35. youproblog says:

    Hi, I found your blog on google. I’m pretty happy to have found your website because I think it is amazing! I will definitely come back! Great resource for my students. Youproblog

  36. Thanks to your research, I will learn more about making toolbars. What the heck, I think I will go out and find all the toolbars you produced and install them on my computer. Imagine all the toys I can buy with your toolbars. Yeah, I understand that was not your point, I was kidding about installing all the toolbars. If I get your drift, and I build a toolbar, and gain some backlinks, I can report back on pagerank, but I am not sure how else to express quality. Maybe an Alexa volume.
    libertballs´s last blog ..Obama’s lost support My ComLuv Profile

  37. The most effective way to leverage your article marketing campaigns is to use an article spinning and submitter tool so you’re able to submit lots of articles rapidly. If you submit to more article directories, you will gain more traffic, and definitely will facilitate you to generate high quality links quickly.

  38. Ruth says:

    I bought Backlink flood from eBay for just $5 – contains invaluable advice.

Leave a Reply